‘h’ is for hahaha

Andy Purvis‘s cheeky letter to TREE made me giggle.

About the h index: it’s presumably a random number until you get more than about eight publications? Hmm. I think that possibly this is just more MeyersBriggsian pigeonholing, or perhaps it satisfies a numerological fetish that academics are too lofty to admit. Heh. I think mine is 2.5.

Leave a Comment